THURSDAY NOVEMBER 28, 2013 @ 3:33 P.M.
UPDATE on: November 10, 2013
How unfair it is - having the police ignore the medical and other evidence and instead tell me "you're paranoid" etc., trying to get me to voluntarily commit myself to a psychiatric evaluation at the hospital.
Just try to imagine the fear and anxiety in trying to fend off being committed to a psychiatric facility - for standing up for your rights in a case such a this!!! This is what happened to me on Wednesday night.
Soon i will have to defend myself alone in the court - my defense: the truth - at this point...i'm doubting that the truth is worth anything in this matter.
From past experience I already know that legal aid won't be able to represent me [i see them on Tuesday] - the reason will be that they only give representation if the crown is seeking jail time - they cannot realistically seek jail time in this - and as such - I'm AGAIN ineligible for legal aid - I have an appointment on Tuesday and that is what I will be told.
It should be noted that these current charges involving Dr. Falconer [among inconsistencies] have me calling her: from June 01, 2002 - that's correct - 4 days before the procedure!!!!
No doubt Falconer's credibility is going to be in question over this point...along with many others.
The criminal code reads:
"Every one who, without lawful excuse and with intent to harass any person, makes or causes to be made repeated telephone calls to that person is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction." [s. 372(3)]
A specific 'defense' wording is there for a reason. The language of the Code contemplates that there are times an individual might indeed have a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" to another individual.
I assert that, under these circumstances, one could reasonably argue having a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" - in connection to a boycott for a resolution of this outstanding and 'irregular' June 05, 2002 incident.
Further, the consideration of such a legitimate defense comes with application of mens rea, which is a legal concept surrounding 'state of mind' or in other-words 'intent'.
Of course, such so-called "repeated telephone calls" - as part of a boycott are not intended to "harass" - nor even to "alarm or annoy" the connected parties. I can defend this vigorously and quite legitimately.
It's nothing short of amazing - the amount of tenacity that God is giving me to deal with this original abuse, the fight for justice and - the continued abuse along the way.
Without a doubt - were it not for God this matter would have overwhelmed me long ago. It did get the better of me for a time...
Ultimately, the teachings found in the ancient vedic scriptures have provided a solid foundation for me in this connection.
It has become my >duty< to see this matter to JUST closure.
"Anyone who gives up prescribed duties as troublesome or out of fear of bodily discomfort is said to have renounced in the mode of passion. Such action never leads to the elevation of renunciation." [Bhagavad Gita 18.8]
With detachment being very important in maintaining overall equilibrium - i have a gained a significant philosophical perspective on this matter - evident by the many postings here in this regard - yet it is of no question that i just give it all up on that basis. People have taunted me in this regard in the past.
Having said that - I'm feeling wearied and broken by this 11+ year abuse of my rights.
What has been done to me can happen to others - in fact - as a technologically driven society - we're right now on the vanguard of the integration of implantable technologies - for many purposes, covert surveillance being just one.
In Canada we have a defined set of rights...
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms:
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice
8. Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure
12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment
An example of related jurisprudence:
"There is no question that personal autonomy, at least with respect to the right to make choices concerning one's own body, control over one's physical and psychological integrity, and basic human dignity are encompassed within security of the person, at least to the extent of freedom from criminal prohibitions which interfere with these." [Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney General)]
This implant abuse violates those three sections!
If i give up - they win. As long as i do not - there is no certainty to that 'SGI win'.
Apparently, they think that now - having an accumulation of years whereby i have continued to boycott/protest them is, combined with their feeble "psychological issues" a good defense. It isn't.
The accumulation of years - is the result of the concealment and evasion of this matter. The "psychological issues" angle is laughable in the face of the very real and objective medical evidence i have - 2 x-rays do not show "psychological issues" - rather they show metal hardware that was placed into my left maxilla sinus on June 05, 2002.
These disingenuous parties think that they're dealing with a moron...
Saskatchewan Privacy Act::
Violation of privacy
2. It is a tort, actionable without proof of damage, for a person willfully and without claim of right, to violate the privacy of another person. R.S.S. 1978, c.P-24, s.2.
*9. Repealed 2004, c.L-16.1, s.68
Crown is bound
11. The Crown is bound by this Act. R.S.S. 1978, c.P-24, s.11.
*(There's NO statute of limitations in the Privacy Act!
Saskatchewan Limitations Act:
4 This Act binds the Crown. 2004, c.L-16.1, s.4.
17 The limitation periods established by this Act or any other Act or regulation
are suspended during any time in which the person against whom the claim is
(a) wilfully conceals from the claimant the fact that injury, loss or damage
has occurred, that it was caused by or contributed to by an act or omission or
that the act or omission was that of the person against whom the claim is
(b) wilfully misleads the claimant as to the appropriateness of a proceeding
as a means of remedying the injury, loss or damage. 2004, c.L-16.1, s.17.
UPDATE on: November 08, 2013
This is the last call with an SGI lawyer this week - i think many good points were brought up in this call...
UPDATE on: November 07, 2013
Well i guess i don't have any rights after all - LAST NIGHT I WAS ARRESTED AND CHARGED with making harassing calls - yup no justice for me and - NO ONE CARES!
I cannot fathom how my charter and legal rights have been so thoroughly stomped out - i have TWO independent x-rays and other evidences [many posted on this site] - among them the fact that Falconer and Katz both lied during the Review by the Privacy Commissioner - additionally Falconer lied in her 2004 police statements - BUT none of that matters!!
Yeah i know they're all likely reading this too AND they know the truth about this matter...
So i have to now go and fight two sets of charges - one for the dentist and one for SGI - one in Regina next month and the other in January here - yup the fight of my life and - I'm ON MY OWN - feeling very let down and broken...dehumanized.
Oh and these current charges involving Falconer [among inconsistencies] has me calling her: from June 01, 2002 - that's correct - 4 days before the procedure!!!! No doubt Falconer's credibility is going to be in question over this point...along with many others.
It's quite an understatement to say I'm tired of this entire ordeal. The abuse itself and the struggle to get it resolved - with so many people assuming I'm so-called 'crazy' - while Ignoring the two independent x-rays and the many inconsistencies with their version.
No one wants to know what that is like - to have such a heinous thing happen to them and to have people call them crazy when they try to speak out about it!
UPDATE on: October 23, 2013
UNINTERRUPTED & LAWFUL Google-telephone boycott of Wascana dental and SGI head office [it now includes SGI legal department] continues - SO THANKFUL FOR MJ POLICE SERVICE!
They must understand that they cannot block the Google phone and the local authorities are not being manipulated by them and their now desperate attempts to trounce me and my lawful boycott.
Another call [10/22/13] with another disingenuous SGI lawyer - yes my tone >is< indignant but that is to be expected - Sad i have to fight this battle for rights - risking my freedom - SGI can try to claim it's harassment but it's not. They ARE disingenuous!
On September 30th I called the SGI lawyer who wrote the so-called SEPTEMBER 19, 2013 desist letter I posted last week - I recorded the call...
The call speaks for itself - yes I was somewhat hyper in the call - but considering the stresses of this matter - I didn't say anything out-of-order.
If SGI thinks "he has psychological issues" is a good defense - that is very feeble. There are two independent X-rays and other evidences - simply denying it and calling me crazy isn't going to solve this problem.
UPDATE on September 28, 2013
The UNINTERRUPTED Google-telephone boycott of Wascana dental continues: Monday to Friday 8-5 PM!
IT NOW INCLUDES SGI's HEAD OFFICE...AFTER ALL THIS TIME I'M FORCED TO MAKE BOYCOTT CALLS TO THE PRESIDENT OF SGI.
God bless the police - they have not interfered.
It is now been 11 years 3 months and 23 days since this IMPLANT ABUSE began!
Sad that an individual has to be reduced to this - to get rights in Canada - the country always howling up it's human rights image as an example to be followed...
God bless Google for them letting me use "Google Phone" for this boycott
It is quite obvious they have found a way to prevent their number from being blocked by Wascana dental AND SGI
Received this letter last week - vain threats will not do - what SGI hasn't already contacted the local police? Yup to have to risk freedom for rights!?!
UPDATE on June 05, 2013
UPDATE on March 19, 2013
The telephone boycott of Wascana dental in Regina resumed on November 20, 2012 and - it continues - God bless the police - they have not interfered and - if there is a visit to come then - i will have to be prepared to go to court and defend my actions.
Amazingly, this time they cannot block the Google Phone, i just wish i wasn't STILL begging for rights in Canada - that were ripped away A VERY LONG 10 years 7 months ago.
Hey it's not like i want to call - actually i have nothing to say to them - the inconvenience of receiving these calls are merely to urge them to at last act properly drop the concealment's and be responsible - there is a better chance of that happening - by not permitting the matter to be forgotten.
UPDATE on June 27, 2012
My Mom died of a major heart attack and/or a stroke on June 09th - I found her in her apartment - it has been VERY difficult for me. Sad that my Mom died before this matter was resolved. Of course, the people responsible for this June 05, 2002 implant issue don't care in the least.